CNPS Forums  

Go Back   CNPS Forums > CNPS Public Forums > Plant Conservation Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2004, 04:44 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Southern California wildfires

From: Shannon , mitch.mon@verizon.net
Date: 11/06/03
Time: 12:35 PM


I am concerned about what is going to happen in the fire areas. How do we protect native species? Who do we contact in government so exotic species are not seeded in the areas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2004, 04:44 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: felixlopezmail@yahoo.com
Date: 11/07/03
Time: 02:18 PM


Dear Shannon: A first step is to gain a better understanding of the organizational structure of government agencies who promulgate environmental law in California. Because of their legal jurisdiction these agencies provide both lead agency and primary agency responsibility in guidance of policy. More importantly, they may have access to funding dollars to support projects in your area. I would also recommend you become familiar with the California Public Code, CEQA, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, NEPA, Cal-EPA, and other such landmark legislation. Also get familiar with the local General Plans of the cities and counties in your area. The General Plan contains four to ten "planning elements" which guide local officials. I would recommend you start by searching the following website: http://ceres.ca.gov/ quote: "The goal of CERES is to improve environmental analysis and planning by integrating natural and cultural resource information from multiple contributors and by making it available and useful to a wide variety of users." unquote If you the time and resources there is nothing better than citizen involvement. But it does take hard work and commitment. I have found that most government agencies do a pretty good job although at times they are overwhelmed with projects and the power of nature. Plz excuse any spelling or grammar errors. Felix A. Lopez BA-Biological Science MBA - Strategic Planning Certificate in Urban & Regional Planning
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2004, 03:09 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wildfires & Natural Vegetation

The following was published in the Channel Islands Chapter's newsletter, Matilija Copy, in September 2004, based primarily on a presentation made by Dr. Jon Keeley.

By David Magney

You all remember the wildfires of October 2003 and other years. They can be very scary for homeowners who live next to natural vegetation that is prone to burn easily. It is interesting though, how people?s perceptions can be influenced by ignorance or misinformation, such as when the news anchor labels a burned area of chaparral a ?disaster?, showing scenes of scorched hillsides. The fact is, natural vegetation in southern California is able to cope very well to periodic, but infrequent fires. It is humans that do not cope so well, and we too often put our fears, as truly real as they are, onto natural ecosystems.


This picture of one of the October 2003 fires in San Diego County was clipped from a photo in a presentation by Dr. Jon Keeley of the USGS. (The pictures won't post here, so go to Keeley's site - provided at the end of this posting, or download the newsletter from www.cnpsci.org.)

Colonists to southern California early recognized that water quality was dependent on a healthy watershed, which meant that the native vegetation growing on our mountains and hillsides was providing an invaluable function in maintaining water quality and water quantity for downstream areas. When the natural vegetation is removed, for any reason, there is a significant increase in surface runoff, mudslides, sedimentation of streams, and reduced water percolation into the local aquifers. This realization was the foundation of the Forest Preserve system (the precursor to the Forest Service) established by President Theodore Roosevelt in the late 1890s. In fact, the Pine Mountain and Zaca Lake Forest Reserve was the first reserve established anywhere in the United States, specifically to protect the watersheds supporting Ojai (then called Nordhoff), San Buenaventura, Santa Barbara, and other communities. The boundaries and names changed over the years, and finally evolved into the Los Padres National Forest (in 1936 or 1938). Other Preserves were established in Los Angeles County, and elsewhere.


Tributary to Towsley Canyon at the eastern end of the Santa Susana Mountains just southwest of Newhall, burned in October 2003. This area was dominated by Chamise Chaparral, view southward. ?David Magney 2003. (Same for this picture.)

Firefighting was a major focus of these federal reserves, and subsequent incarnations. The mantra has almost always been to suppress any and all wildfires. Frankly, based on extensive research by a number of very talented ecologists and fire specialists, such as Dr. Jon Keeley, now with the U.S. Geologic Survey, we have a much better understanding of the history and ecological effects of natural wildfires and vegetation response, and how fire suppression has worked and not worked.


Lyon Canyon at the eastern end of the Santa Susana Mountains just southwest of Newhall, burned in October 2003 (immediately south of Stevenson Ranch, which did not burn at all). This area was dominated by Chamise Chaparral with Coast Live Oak Forest/Woodland dominating the lower slopes and canyons,, view eastward. This is the property that the Dukes of Hazard was filmed on. The chaparral is resprouting well, and many of the Coast Live Oak trees are recovering too. ?David Magney 2003. (Same for this picture.)

Jon Keeley and C.J. Fotheringham presented some very interesting data in 2004 on the effects of fire fighting efforts over the last 100 years in southern California, focusing on shrubland wildfires, the type of wildfire we face in Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties. Their findings are summarized below.

One of the problems revealed by their study is that fire fighters have been treating forests and shrublands the same in their efforts to manage and prevent wildfires; however, they are very different. A prescription for forests (vegetation dominated by trees) is not appropriate for shrublands such as Coastal Sage Scrub and Chaparral. They behave very differently when burning. The fire suppression policies have resulted in fire exclusion, when such goals jeopardize the health of the natural vegetation, which follows with threats and damage to human structures and lives.

Money spent suppressing and fighting wildfires has increased dramatically every decade over the past 100-plus years; however, the number of acres burned has remained relatively stable: lots of acres of natural vegetation burn every year. If the goal of fire fighters is to reduce the area burned, clearly spending more taxpayer dollars has failed to reduce the acreage that does burn.

Most wildfires now are started by arsonists or by accident by humans, ironically often when they are clearing vegetation around their homes, as required by the fire departments. Prior to the population explosion and people building their homes in shrubland habitats, most fires were started by lightning strikes, which is rare in southern California, except in the higher mountains.

One of the concepts strongly implemented by wildland fire fighters is the desire to create defensible space between combustible natural vegetation and human structures. These come in a variety of forms, including clear zones around all homes, fuel breaks along ridges, and a mosaic of different-aged vegetation. Ventura County Fire Department requires homeowners to clear natural vegetation 100 feet around their homes, and if they don?t, the Fire Department will hire someone to do it for them and send the bill to the homeowner.


This photo shows a firebreak (right center) and a brush clearance zone (left center, near the houses) in an area of chaparral that burned in October 2003 (courtesy Jon Keeley). (Same for this picture.)

The fires of October 2003 very clearly taught us that having fuelbreaks, multi-aged vegetation mosaics, and brush-clear zones around our homes does not necessarily prevent homes from catching fire; not when Santa Ana winds are fanning the flames and sending embers thousands of feet, including across 8-lane freeways. Basically, there is no such thing as defensible space, there is no such thing as a wide enough fuelbreak when the flames are fed by these hot and strong winds. Those houses that did not burn were those that took care to reduce or eliminate combustible fuels immediately next to them. Those with shake roofs went up in flames.

The practice of prescribed or controlled burning of shrublands was an interesting idea; however, this practice does nothing to stem the spread of wildfires spread by the Santa Ana winds, and the data show that most of the devastating fires in southern California are indeed such fires. Keeley and Fotheringham point out that strategic placement is far more effective in reducing losses from wildfires than spending money on attempts to create barriers. Treating acreage of brush is not effective. Where structures are placed and how they are maintained are far more important factors. Creating fire breaks and fuel-clear zones damages the natural ecosystem both directly and indirectly, by reducing the amount of native vegetation and creating pathways and habitat for invasive exotic species, such as Yellow Star-thistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Yellow Star-thistle invasion not only adversely affects native habitats, it is a major agricultural pest, costing farmers and the governments millions of dollars to control, all needless and adverse effects of our current fire fighting strategies.

Keeley and Fotheringham, and CNPS, argue that a better way to manage these wildfire events, in much the way the government plans for other natural disasters such as earthquakes, is by engineering human infrastructure to minimize impacts and risks to humans and their structures. This in part is the responsibility of planning departments, who must work in conjunction with resource agencies, conservation organizations, fire departments, and landowners to really work towards viable solutions, not just standing by and watching our tax dollars go up in smoke.

For more information on this subject, and to download a copy of Keeley and Fotheringham?s presentation, visit www.sdfirerecovery.net on the internet and migrate to the Shrublands Management page.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2005-2009, California Native Plant Society, All rights reserved.