
Policy on the Intentional Introduction of Non-Native Species
Adopted April 23, 1999
Whereas
1. The mission of the California Native Plant Society is to
increase the understanding and appreciation of California's native
plants and to preserve them in their natural habitat through
scientific activities, education, and conservation.
2. Great economic damage and damage to native plant communities
has been caused by the intentional introduction of non-native
species* in California and elsewhere.
Examples of ecological and economic damage include:
- Invasive non-native species cause up to $123 billion in
economic losses in the United States each year.
- Non-native species are implicated in the decline of 49%
species (57% of plants) on the U.S. Federal endangered species
list.
Examples of damaging invasive species include:
- Tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima and other species) were
planted for streambank stabilization, windbreaks, and erosion
control. This species displaces native plants and animals and
disrupts hydrologic and ecological processes.
- European beach grass (Ammophila arenaria), planted for
dune stabilization, is aggressively invading dune systems
throughout the west, displacing native species and communities.
- Blue gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) was
introduced for wind breaks and fiber production. It has invaded
thousands of acres of California ecosystems, displacing native
species.
- Iceplant (Carpobrotus edulis) was planted for erosion
control. It too has aggressively invaded and displaced native
plant communities, particularly in coastal communities.
- Non-native trout continue to be stocked into rivers, lakes,
and streams for sportfishing, where they displace and consume
native aquatic species and disrupt ecosystem processes.
- Feral pigs, released for sport hunting into California
wildlands, have caused serious habitat disturbance and damage to
plant communities throughout California and the west.
*For the purposes of this policy, non-native species are those
species that were not present at a site prior to European contact.
3. Natural and human-caused climate change, combined with the
enormous diversity and complexity of California ecosystems, make it
extremely difficult to predict the impacts of any non-native
species, either on the target ecosystem or adjacent ecosystems.
4. The susceptibility of California ecosystems to invasion by
non-native species is increasing due to accelerating habitat
fragmentation, disturbance and the ever-growing number and variety
of non-native species present in California.
Therefore, it is resolved that
Because of the potential effects on native vegetation and
individual native plant species, the California Native Plant Society
opposes the intentional introduction or maintenance of non-native
species in California wildland ecosystems unless
1. the non-native species is being used in a program to restore
the health of a native ecosystem, and the non-native species has
been shown by thorough testing not to persist in the target
ecosystem or to spread into non-target ecosystems, or
2. the non-native species is a biological control agent intended
to attack an invasive non-native organism, and has been
scientifically demonstrated to pose a negligible threat to native
ecosystems and species.
Partial Bibliography
California Exotic Pest Plant Council. 1998. Exotic pest plants of
greatest ecological concern in California. California Exotic Plant
Pest Council c/o Sally Davis, 32912 Calle del Tesoro, San Juan
Capistrano, CA 92675-4227.
D'Antonio, C.M. and P.M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by
exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual
Review of Ecology and Systematics. 23: 63-87.
Dudley, T. and M. Embury. 1995. Non-indigenous species in
wilderness areas: the status and impacts of livestock and game
species in designated wilderness in California. Pacific Institute
for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CA.
Dudley, T. and B. Collins. 1995. Biological invasions in
California wetlands: the impacts and control of non-indigenous
species in natural areas. Pacific Institute for Studies in
Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CA.
Pimentel, D., L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 1999.
Environmental and Economic Costs Associated with Non-Indigenous
Species in the United States. Cornell University web page: www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Jan99/species_costs.html.
Rejmanek, M. and J.R. Randall. 1994. Invasive alien plants in
California: 1993 summary and comparison with other areas in North
America. Madroņo 41(3): 161-77.
Stein, B.A. and S.R. Flack, eds. 1996. Americas Least Wanted:
Alien Species Invasion of U.S. Ecosystems. The Nature Conservancy,
Arlington, VA.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Harmful
Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. OTA-F-565. U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington DC
Whitson, T.D., L.C. Burrill, S.A. Dewey, D.W. Cudney, B.E.
Nelson, R.D. Lee, and R. Parker, eds. 1996. Weeds of the West. 5th
Edition. Western Society of Weed Science, Newark, CA.
Wilcove, D.S., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos.
1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States.
Bioscience 48(8): 607-15.

|